Consummation, traditionally a crucial aspect of marriage, involves the completion of sexual intercourse. In Indian law, non-consummation can be a significant ground for seeking annulment or divorce. This discussion explores the legal considerations surrounding non-consummation, including impotency, cruelty, and relevant case laws.
What is Consummation?
Legally, consummation requires “ordinary and complete” sexual intercourse, not “partial and imperfect” acts. Incapacity must be physical or psychological, permanent, and incurable. Prior successful intercourse is irrelevant if the incapacity existed at the time of marriage. Consummation refers to the capacity for sexual intercourse, not the ability to procreate. Therefore, a marriage is considered consummated even if one party is sterile or infertile.
Grounds for Non-Consummation
There are two primary situations for non-consummation:
-
Impotency: This is a ground for making a marriage voidable under Section 12 of the Hindu Marriage Act (HMA), 1955. It can also be recognized as part of cruelty under Section 13 of HMA.
-
Persistent Refusal: Persistent refusal to have marital intercourse amounts to cruelty.
What Amounts to Impotency?
Impotency must exist at the time of marriage consummation. It refers to the practical impossibility of consummating the marriage, i.e., the inability to perform or permit the complete act of sexual intercourse. Partial, imperfect, difficult, or painful intercourse can amount to impotency. However, occasional incomplete intercourse does not qualify. Impotency can be physical or mental, including emotional, psychological, or moral aversion to the sexual act. If impotency can be cured by treatment, it may not be considered unless the person refuses treatment.
Nature and Scope of Cruelty
Cruelty, as a ground for divorce, is defined as conduct that endangers the life, limb, or health of a spouse. It includes acts causing bodily injury or reasonable apprehension of such injury, suffering, or harm to health. Cruelty can be physical or mental, with mental cruelty involving conduct that causes mental suffering or fear. The court does not consider the sensitivity of the petitioner but rather the general conduct that would be dangerous for a spouse to endure.
Persistent Refusal to Indulge in Sexual Intercourse
A single or isolated refusal does not amount to cruelty. The person should be fulfilling marital obligations on most occasions. Persistent refusal over a long period without excuse can be considered cruelty.
Intention to Commit Matrimonial Offence
Intention is not essential for cruelty. If a husband is unable to have proper sexual intercourse, leaving the wife unsatisfied, it constitutes cruelty, even without deliberate intent.
Pregnancy and Non-Consummation
Pregnancy does not automatically prove consummation. Fecundation can occur without penetration or ordinary intercourse. The birth of a child is not conclusive evidence of consummation.
Delay and Condonation
Condonation applies to acts of physical cruelty, where parties living together implies forgiveness. However, sexual weakness and inability to have normal intercourse are recurring forms of mental cruelty, which cannot be condoned by delay.
Important Note
Proving non-consummation in marriage involves understanding the legal definitions of impotency and cruelty. Impotency refers to the inability to perform complete sexual intercourse, while cruelty includes conduct that endangers a spouse’s well-being. Persistent refusal to engage in sexual intercourse can also be considered cruelty. The courts have recognized that a sexless marriage can cause mental and physical harm, entitling the affected party to seek legal remedies. It is crucial to understand these aspects when considering legal action based on non-consummation.